Over the past year, the phrase Post-Truth Era has been showing up in a lot of media. But what exactly does this mean? This is not a new concept; however, social media and the ease and convenience of accessing information has given rise to incidences of news being distributed that is inaccurate, skewed, biased, or completely fabricated. Today there is an influx of finger-pointing and accusation about fake news.
It seems as if the most reliable of sources are being accused of disseminated falsehoods. By taking the time to research facts as they are presented to you, you can filter out the false and biased news and concentrate on credible information.
In the Information Age you deserve accurate and comprehensive information. Everyone deserves the truth. Individuals can act in harmful ways after reading fake news.
The spreading of lies and deceit creates hostility. Accusations made against credible news organizations cause mistrust in those organizations. Walden U Library. Advanced Search. Fact v. Print Page Report a broken link. What is Fake News? Post-Truth Era Why is this important to you?
60d. Living in the Information Age
Why is this important to you? Fake news is a threat In the Information Age you deserve accurate and comprehensive information. Fake news is dangerous Individuals can act in harmful ways after reading fake news. Fake news creates distrust in all news Accusations made against credible news organizations cause mistrust in those organizations. Disability Services Any concerns about accessibility of materials on this site or compatibility with assistive technology should be addressed to disability mail.
Walden Staff Login.In fact, a recent Nielsen Scarborough study found that more than million adults in the U. Newspapers remain largely a print medium, but the dramatic growth in digital media in recent years has compelled newspaper publishers to re-think their distribution models and become multi-platform content providers. Traditionally, newspaper audiences have been more educated, affluent and older than non-newspaper readers. As digital media have gained in prominence, newspapers have attracted younger readers.
Newspaper readers are still educated and affluent, but their ages are more reflective of the general population than they have been in the past. Compared to previous decades, younger readers now account for a greater percentage of newspaper readers.
Despite their growing appeal among younger readers through digital channels, newspapers still maintain an educated and affluent audience. And by broadening their distribution to digital channels, many newspapers have attracted digital readers, who represent an even more affluent and educated segment of readers.
Download a customizable template here. As businesses across the U. Much like the sentiment felt among European consumers, many North Americans expect the impact of the novel coronavirus COVID to last for quite some time. Year-over-year in-store and e-commerce sales up by double-digits, but sales trends have fluctuated following pantry stockpiling in March. Global Nielsen news and insights delivered directly to your inbox. Newspapers Deliver Across the Ages. Contact Us.
The industrial revolution in the late nineteenth century ushered in the industrial age, and the digital revolution in the mid twentieth century spurred the emergence of the information age. So it is not entirely crazy to speculate about what might lie beyond the information age.
Of course, I am not arguing that information will become obsolete.
Social Media and the Information Age: Using Influence and Persuasion in Public Service
Firms will always need to harness information in effective ways, just as most of them still need industrial techniques to make their products cheaply and efficiently. My point, instead, is that information will become necessary but not sufficient for firms to be successful.
Both are valuable concepts, but their benefits are incremental, not revolutionary. So just as night follows day, the information age will eventually be superseded by another age; and it behooves those with senior executive responsibility to develop a point of view on what that age might look like. So here is a specific question that helps us develop this point of view — one that was a topic of debate at our annual Global Leadership Summit at London Business Schoolfocused this year on the rapid advance of technology and its impact on not only business, but society, politics and the economy: What would a world with too much information look like?
And what problems would it create? I think there are at least four answers:. Paralysis through Analysis. In a world of ubiquitous information, there is always more out there. Information gathering is easy, and often quite enjoyable as well. My students frequently complain that they need more information before coming to a view on a difficult case-study decision. Many corporate decisions are delayed because of the need for further analysis.
Whether due to the complexity of the decision in front of them, or because of the fear of not performing sufficient due diligence, the easy option facing any executive is simply to request more information.
Easy access to data makes us intellectually lazy. But a data-driven approach to analysis has a couple of big flaws. First, the bigger the database, the easier it is to find support for any hypothesis you choose to test.
Second, big data makes us lazy — we allow rapid processing power to substitute for thinking and judgment. It was a bust. Most have now moved back towards a more rational model based around deep understanding, experience and intuition. Impulsive and Flighty Consumers. Watch how your fellow commuters juggle their smartphone, tablet and Kindle.
Or marvel at your teenager doing his homework. With multiple sources of stimulation available at our fingertips, the capacity to focus and concentrate on a specific activity is falling. A little learning is a dangerous thing. We are quick to access information that helps us, but we often lack the ability to make sense of it, or to use it appropriately.
Doctors encounter this problem on a daily basis, as patients show up with often incorrect self-diagnoses. Senior executives second-guess their subordinates because their corporate IT system gives them line-of-sight down to detailed plant-level data. We also see this at a societal level: people believe they have the right to information that is in the public interest think Wikileaksbut they are rarely capable of interpreting and using it in a sensible way.
At an individual level, we face two contrasting risks. One is that we become obsessed with getting to the bottom of a problem, and we keep on digging, desperate to find the truth but taking forever to do so. The other risk is that we become overwhelmed with the amount of information out there and we give up: we realise we cannot actually master the issue at hand, and we end up falling back on a pre-existing belief.
For firms, there are three important consequences.What comes next after the information age? Answer by Brian Biformer software engineer at Google, on Quora :. In the Industrial Age and the Information Age, there was widespread optimism that technology would eventually solve all of our problems—poverty, disease, violence, and others.
While technology has certainly lifted many humans out of poverty and enriched our lives in many ways, it has also made the world increasingly complex and difficult to navigate. We are not weaker or stupider than our ancestors, but the world is more challenging than ever before and we need to go through more trial and error than they did in order to secure a comfortable existence.
Continued technological development will increase material abundance even more, but technology alone cannot solve the problem of figuring out whom to distribute resources to and getting everyone on board with how resources are distributed. Despite the fact that we are supposed to be more connected than ever before, many people are lonely and starved of genuine positive human attention.
This question originally appeared on Quora - the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world. More questions:. Quora: the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world. This is a BETA experience. Edit Story. Jan 16,pm EST. Quora Contributor Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own. Recommended For You.The next day, in an exclusive on its front page that read like a Hollywood screenplay outline, the Washington Post reported her heroic story.
A few days later she was daringly rescued by US commandos. The story echoed through the broadcasting and print news media in the United States, throughout the world, and on the web. A website was established to receive and share tributes to her gallantry and feats.
Scott Drake, webmaster of Jessica-Lynch. This frame, or point of view, was widely used in many accounts of the event. Viacom offered her a package: a prime-time news interview on its CBS television network; a book deal with its publishing house, Simon and Schuster; a music-video host spot on its cable channel MTV2; and a movie contract.
Eventually she signed with NBC, which had indicated that it was going to make a TV movie about her whether it had the rights to her story or not. Knopf, Promoting the book, Ms. She was the subject of a cover story in Time magazine and was featured in Glamour magazine as one of its women of the year. She did not fight or shoot at any enemy soldiers. The rescue may not have been necessary because the Iraqi army had fled from the hospital the previous day, although it probably still controlled the town.
Hospital staff had escorted the commandos to her ward. Over two years after the initial event, a former deputy commander at the United States Central Command wrote an op-ed column in the New York Times reminding people that Private Lynch had never claimed to be a hero and denying that the military had played up her rescue for its publicity purposes.
The Jessica Lynch story graphically reveals the interconnection of communication, information, and the media, as well as their significance for government and politics. These are the subjects of this chapter. Previous: Publisher Information. Next: 1. Share This Book Share on Twitter.The Information Age also known as the Computer AgeDigital Ageor New Media Age is a historical period that began in the midth century, characterized by a rapid epochal shift from the traditional industry established by the Industrial Revolution to an economy primarily based upon information technology.
According to the United Nations Public Administration Networkthe Information Age was formed by capitalizing on computer microminiaturization advances,  which, upon broader usage within society, would lead to modernized information and to communication processes becoming the driving force of social evolution. Library expansion was calculated in by Fremont Rider to double in capacity every 16 years were sufficient space made available.
Rider did not foresee, however, the digital technology that would follow decades later to replace analog microform with digital imagingstorageand transmission mediawhereby vast increases in the rapidity of information growth would be made possible through automatedpotentially- lossless digital technologies. Accordingly, Moore's lawformulated aroundwould calculate that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years.
By the early s, along with improvements in computing powerthe proliferation of the smaller and less expensive personal computers allowed for immediate access to information and the ability to share and store such for increasing numbers of workers. Connectivity between computers within organizations enabled employees at different levels to access greater amounts of information.
The world's technological capacity to store information grew from 2. The amount of digital data stored appears to be growing approx. As such, Kryder's law prescribes that the amount of storage space available appears to be growing approximately exponentially. The world's technological capacity to receive information through one-way broadcast networks was exabytes of optimally compressed information in ; optimally compressed exabytes in ; 1.
The world's effective capacity to exchange information through two-way telecommunication networks was petabytes of optimally compressed information in ; petabytes in ; 2.
The world's technological capacity to compute information with humanly guided general-purpose computers grew from 3. In terms of capacity, there are two measures of importance: the number of operations a system can perform and the amount of information that can be stored.
Information in the Primary Information age was handled by newspapersradio and television. The Secondary Information Age was developed by Internetsatellite televisions and mobile phones. Today we are experiencing it. Eventually, Information and communication technology ICT —i. The Information Age has affected the workforce in several ways, such as compelling workers to compete in a global job market.
One of the most evident concerns is the replacement of human labor by computers that can do their jobs faster and more effectively, thus creating a situation in which individuals who perform tasks that can easily be automated are forced to find employment where their labor is not as disposable.
Thus, individuals who lose their jobs may be pressed to move up into joining "mind workers" e. Along with automation, jobs traditionally associated with the middle class e. For example, workers in the United States were once well paid in comparison to those in other countries. With the advent of the Information Age and improvements in communication, this is no longer the case, as workers must now compete in a global job marketwhereby wages are less dependent on the success or failure of individual economies.
In effectuating a globalized workforcethe internet has just as well allowed for increased opportunity in developing countriesmaking it possible for workers in such places to provide in-person services, therefore competing directly with their counterparts in other nations.
This competitive advantage translates into increased opportunities and higher wages. The Information Age has affected the workforce in that automation and computerisation have resulted in higher productivity coupled with net job loss in manufacturing. Although it initially appeared that job loss in the industrial sector might be partially offset by the rapid growth of jobs in information technologythe recession of March foreshadowed a sharp drop in the number of jobs in the sector.
This pattern of decrease in jobs would continue until and data has shown that, overall, technology creates more jobs than it destroys even in the short run. Industry has become more information-intensive while less labor - and capital-intensive. This has left important implications for the workforceas workers have become increasingly productive as the value of their labor decreases. For the system of capitalism itself, not only is the value of labor decreased, the value of capital is also diminished.
In the classical modelinvestments in human and financial capital are important predictors of the performance of a new venture. The Information Age was enabled by technology developed in the Digital Revolutionwhich was itself enabled by building on the developments of the Technological Revolution. The onset of the Information Age can be associated with the development of transistor technology. This was a breakthrough that laid the foundations for modern technology. Atalla and Dawon Kahng at Bell Labs in The growth in the internet, hour television and mobile phones means that we now receive five times as much information every day as we did in But that pales into insignificance compared with the growth in the amount of information we churn out through email, twitter, social networking sites and text messages.
Every day the average person produces six newspapers worth of information compared with just two and a half pages 24 years ago — nearly a fold increase. All this information needs storing and we now each have the equivalent ofbooks stored in computers, microchips and even the strip on the back of your credit card. The extent of the information revolution and digital age has been calculated by Dr Martin Hilbert and his team at the University of southern California.
They used a complex formula to calculate the average amount of information stored — and sent — in the world — from every medium from computers to paper and books — to letters in the post.
The researchers surveyed 60 categories of analogue and digital technologies during the period from toand the results reflect our near complete transition to the digital age.
Using the analogy of an 85 page newspaper, they found that in we received around 40 newspapers full of information every day but this had rocketed to in In we sent out — mainly by post, telephone and fax — around two and a half pages of newspaper each day. This had increased to six newspapers thanks to email, digital photography, Twitter and social network sites by The actual switchover from analogue to digital occurred in and now 94 per cent of all data is stored in a digital form.
Just 10 years ago — it was just a quarter, the vast majority still stored on video and audio cassettes. The researchers, who reported their findings in the journal Science, found that there was now exabytes of data floating around the world — that's 29,, pieces of information. While this is enormous — times the number of grains of sand on Earth — Dr Hilbert points out it is still less than one per cent of the information that is stored in the DNA of a single human being. The ability to process all this information with computers has doubled every 18 months and with telecommunication devices has doubled every two years.Joe Rogan - The Information Age Will Reverse the Industrial Age w/Naval Ravikat
But despite it showing enormous growth, Dr Hilbert said we are far from saturation point and nowhere near dealing with the amount of information contended with in the natural world. Dr Martin Hilbert, of the University of California, said: "These numbers are impressive, but still minuscule compared to the order of magnitude at which nature handles information. If we tried to store the name of every star in the Universe we could only file one per cent.